Ryan has extensive experience representing clients in eminent domain litigation throughout Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana. Ryan’s other representative cases include the following:

• Newforth v. Bault, 120 N.E.3d 594 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019)
  • Served as first chair during two-day bench trial, obtained declaratory judgment and permanent injunction for client, confirming his right to install access driveways within an easement area owned by an objecting neighbor.
• Panhandle E. Pipeline, Co., L.P. v. Plummer, 2018 WL 1505013 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 27, 2018)
  • Obtained permanent injunction and final judgment for damages, including $149,043.90 attorneys’ fees award for Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, L.P., in case involving breach of settlement agreement relating to easement.
• Preferred Professional Insurance Co. v. West, et al., 23 N.E.2d 716 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014)
  • Obtained summary judgment for client Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund in case involving question of first impression regarding whether a claimant having no prior or existing physician/patient relationship can pursue claims (and recover damages) against physician for medical malpractice under Indiana Medical Malpractice Act. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Indiana Supreme Court unanimously denied transfer.
• S. Bank, as Trustee v. Mainscape Leasing, LLC, et al., Cause No. 49D13-1701-MF-2030
  • Litigated and resolved complex commercial mortgage foreclosure lawsuit involving multi-million-dollar securitized senior mortgage and multi-million-dollar leasehold mortgage.
• Roche Diagnostic Operations, Inc. v. Marsh Supermarkets, LLC, 987 N.E.2d 72 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013)
  • Member of litigation team that obtained $19,563,933 judgment on behalf of client following a seven-day trial on Marsh’s claim for breach of an 18-year lease. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
• FMS Nephrology Partners North Central Indiana Dialysis Centers v. Select Health, Inc., AAA Case No. 01-21-0017-4637
  • Obtained dispositive summary judgment in favor client Select Health, Inc. (“Select”) holding that Select owed no legal duty to its ancillary network provider FMS Nephrology Partners North Central Indiana Dialysis Centers (“FMS”) to bind payors to pay 100% of FMS’ network rate without any patient responsibility where (i) the parties’ ancillary provider agreement imposed no such duty upon Select; (ii) the patient’s benefits plan contained a benefits limitation for the services at issue; and (iii) FMS failed to pursue the patient for payment following application of benefits.